Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2022

Zubin Mehta 及 Seiji Ozawa 的 video 是真的,其信息是假的

Video 是真的,但信息是假的。假信息說是 2021 年發生的.  但是 Zubin Mehta 及 Seiji Ozawa 最後一次在一起是 2016 年。這是 2016 年的 video, 如果他那時候有 Alzheimer, 他怎麼有可能於 2019 年做那個 Classic Talk interview? 請聽我慢慢道來。


前些日子看到這個 YouTube video, 假如 Ozawa 真的有 Alzheimer, 奇怪 Zubin Mehta 怎麼會這樣向 Seiji Ozawa 致敬?看那個 video, Ozawa  看起來確是好像有 Alzheimer. 看起來確有是輕鬆愉快親熱,但失去尊嚴,這是 Ozawa 非常注重的。最近有机會都在「研究」Ozawa, 從他的職業生涯所作所為所說;如果他自己能做決定, 他不會喜歡如此這般接受表揚的。這不是他的作風(style).

請先看這個真的 video.

Must Watch~ Music Survives Alzheimer's Seiji Ozawa, famous Japanese conductor, has Alzheimer's. Zubin Mehta recently paid tribute to him by taking him to hold

最近讀了一本書叫 Absolutely on music:  conversation with Seiji Ozawa, 對他更敬愛有加. 這更加深我的看法.


我喜歡 Seiji Ozawa, 就如我一位朋友所說「小澤征爾指揮交響樂團的風格獨特」他自己說他盡量不要模仿他的兩位恩師(Bernstein and Karajan), but I see these two maestros in him.


這個 video 是真的, 目前還可在 東京 Suntory Hall (相當於紐約的 Carnegie Hall) 的 Facebook 臉書網頁看到。是 11/1/2016 posted 的。慶祝 Suntory Hall 成立 30 週年紀念音樂會,由 Zubin Mehta 及 Seiji Ozawa 指揮,如果 Ozawa 當時有 Alzheimer’s disease, 他不可能會在這種正式的音樂會指揮的。有報導說因為身體健康的關係所以坐著指揮


印度的一個 Alzheimer’s Society 就使用這個 video 於 6/4/2021 posted 在臉書説 Mehta 如此這般對待有 Alzhimer 的 Ozawa, 情面令人感動。


 我在網路看到一個中文 12/19/2016 post (文茜的世界週報)文內的描述全部跟這個 video 完全一樣。一點也沒有提到 Alzheimer, 只提到他的食道癌。


Classic Talk 
是一個有水準出名的訪問(Interview) 專門訪問古典音樂歌劇方面出名人物。4/3/2019 訪問 Seiji Ozawa. 他的英語不怎麼好但是一個 2016年(video 那一年)有 Alzheimer 的人 能夠在 2019 年有這樣的 Interview 嗎?


Classic talk 4/3/2019

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yXg9m2X0ZrY


Seiji Ozawa 有沒有 Alzheimer 我不知道.  我只是說 Suntory Hall 2016 在臉書 posted 那個 video 時 他沒有 Alzheimer.  我至今不知道他們為什麼會 posted 那個 video? 臉書有 450 多個 comments (5 年前)沒有一個提到 Alzheimer, 只有最近(一年前)幾個才有提到。


他們還說最近(2021 年)Mehta 特別帶 Ozawa 去一個音樂廳讓交響樂團向他致敬。這都是騙人的Mehta 及 Ozawa 最後一次在一起是 2016 年。臉書 9/1/2021 維也納交響樂團祝賀 Ozawa 生日,用 Mehta 跟 Ozawa 2016 年在一起的相片。


網路的假信息多如牛毛, 像這一種很難抓出來,因為他們使用的 video 是真的. 他們只是編造故事適合他們要傳播的假信息,而且 Ozawa 的一些動作看起來確是像有Alzheimer.


Half truth is not truth.

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

名師出高徒(famous teachers produce master apprentices), Karajan and Bernstein are teachers of Seiji Ozawa

This YouTube of Brahms Symphony No. 1 by Karajan is my favorite, the screen shows Karajan in action almost entire 40 some minutes. His actions match the music seamlessly with amazing precision.  It never fails.  If you do not see the orchestra, you’ll believe in me when I say that the music comes from his baton, nay, his magic wand.

Brahms: Symphony No.1 in C Minor, Op.68 (Herbert von Karajan)

Herbert van Karajan
Of course, it is not true for Karajan conducts Brahms German Requiem without a baton.


Karajan tends to conduct with his eyes closing, but I am sure that each and every one in the orchestra knows he is watching over them.

Seiji Ozawa

Seiji Ozawa said it is not how you use the baton in performance, but how you use the baton in rehearsals, that makes a difference. This gives out the answer.  The magic of music created by conductor and orchestra comes from endless rehearsals.


Leonard Bernstein

Both Karajan and Bernstein were teachers of Seiji Ozawa, who said he tried not to mimic or imitate the two maestros, but I see Karajan and Bernstein in him.  I also put the YouTubes of Bernstein and Ozawa conducting Brahms Symphony No. 1 here, so you can compare and contrast. 

Brahms - Symphony No.1 mvt.Ⅰ,Ⅱ&Ⅳ - Leonard Bernstein

Brahms Symphony 1 C Minor op 68 Seiji Ozawa Saito kinen Orchestra Symphony No 1 in C minor

Seiji Ozawa was so successful as conductor for so many symphony orchestras, including Toronto, Chicago, San Francisco, and Boston (29 years), I believe he was also at Vienna State Opera. Yet he said “I was able to communicate with orchestras and convey to them what I wanted them to do——even though I could hardly speak their language.”

Music indeed speaks international language.

I better not to talk about Brahms Symphony no 1, in the interest of the length of article, that should be another post. But, is there anything else new to say about it?

Sunday, June 5, 2022

Why I like violin (or piano) concerto ?

I like violin/piano concerto more than symphony, it has everything that symphony offers, but adding the role of a soloist (violinist or pianist) to the two roles (conductor and orchestra) in symphony makes it more exciting or even produces intrigue.  It is a bit shorter than symphony: 3 movements vs. 4 movements, it may not be a bad news to those who endurance is the issue.

Seiji Ozawa
I always felt the soloist and orchestra can be complementary (相輔相承 or accompaniment) or competitive (兢爭 or even antagonist).  This is only half truth.  The master conductor, Seiji Ozawa, in “Absolutely on Music: Conversation with Seiji Ozawa”, said this relationship exists, but not between soloist and orchestra, but between soloist and conductor. Leonard Bernstein once said to the audience in a concerto performance with Glenn Gould as the soloist, “In a concerto, who is the boss—the soloist [audience laughter building] or the conductor?”

Herbert von Karajan

Seiji Ozawa was with Karajan in Berlin before he became an assistant conductor for Leonard Bernstein in New York, during which period he was called back by Karajan, as his assistant conductor and got his first paying job. He said the approach to the soloist in a concerto of these two maestros (Karajan and Bernstein) is quite different, or almost opposite
.


In the book of “Absolutely on Music: Conversation with Seiji Ozawa”, the interviewer, Haruki Murakami, a Japanese novelist, and Ozawa listen to the recordings of Beethoven’s piano concerto no. 3 by Karajan with Gould and by Bernstein with Gould.  Thus Ozawa is able to point out the difference precisely at what point.

Karajan is absolutely in total control, autocratic or almost tyrannical, he can conduct a concerto as if a symphony, paying no attention to the soloist.  He clearly let you know who is the boss.  The result is out of sync in certain places, although we laymen may not spot them.

Bernstein treats the orchestra members and his assistant conductors as colleagues, they all called him Lenny.  (Ozawa wished Bernstein treated him as a student.). Bernstein’s Beethoven piano concerto with Gould was clearly quite different from that of Karajan (all German music).  Ozawa said Bernstein’s was clearly not a symphony, it is a typical free-spirit Glenn-style.  Bernstein later admitted he submitted to Glenn Gould’s will.

Three years later when Bernstein conducted Brahms piano concerto no. 1 with Gould as the soloist, this time he found there was absolutely no room to compromise (as a layman I would suspect Bernstein felt ‘enough is enough’) It became a memorable performance.  Bernstein came out on the stage before orchestra began playing and made a speech.

I would put the entire lengthy speech here since the theme of this article is “In a concerto, who is the boss—or the conductor?”

(Ozawa readily admitted his English capability, but that was his early days in the West, I think he improved over the years.)

OZAWA: Yes, I was there. As Lenny’s assistant conductor. All of a sudden, before they started playing, Lenny came out on the stage and started talking to the audience. I couldn’t catch his English, so I asked the people around me what he was saying, and I got the general idea.

Bernstein’s speech

Glenn Gould
Don’t be frightened, Mr. Gould is here. [Audience titters.] He’ll appear in a moment. 

I’m not, as you know, in the habit of speaking on any concert except the Thursday-night previews, but a curious situation has arisen, which merits, I think, a word or two. You are about to hear a rather, shall we say, unorthodox performance of the Brahms D-minor Concerto, a performance distinctly different from any I’ve ever heard, or even dreamt of for that matter, in its remarkably broad tempi and its frequent departures from Brahms’ dynamic indications. I cannot say I am in total agreement with Mr. Gould’s conception, and this raises the interesting question: “What am I doing conducting it?” [Audience murmurs.] I’m conducting it because Mr. Gould is so valid and serious an artist that I must take seriously anything he conceives in good faith, and his conception is interesting enough so that I feel you should hear it, too. 

Leonard Bernstein
But the age-old question still remains: “In a concerto, who is the boss—the soloist [audience laughter building] or the conductor?” [More laughter.] The answer is, of course, sometimes one, sometimes the other, depending on the people involved. But almost always, the two manage to get together by persuasion or charm or even threats [laughter] to achieve a unified performance. I have only once before in my life had to submit to a soloist’s wholly new and incompatible concept, and that was the last time I accompanied Mr. Gould. [Audience roars with laughter.] But this time the discrepancies between our views are so great that I feel I must make this small disclaimer. 

Then why, to repeat the question, am I conducting it? Why do I not make a minor scandal—get a substitute soloist or let an assistant conduct it? Because I am fascinated, glad to have the chance for a new look at this much-played work. Because, what’s more, there are moments in Mr. Gould’s performance that emerge with astonishing freshness and conviction. Thirdly, because we can all learn something from this extraordinary artist, who is a thinking performer. And finally, because there is in music what Dimitri Mitropoulos used to call “the sportive element,” that factor of curiosity, adventure, experiment, and I can assure you that it has been an adventure this week collaborating with Mr. Gould on this Brahms concerto, and it’s in this spirit of adventure that we now present it to you. [Sustained applause.]

If both the conductor and the soloist are prominent masters and their interpretations of the music to be performed happen to differ and no compromise can be made, 一山不容二虎, out of sync can happen.  Legend had it that a 1944 live recording of Rubinstein and Toscanini, it sounds as if the two are fighting.

According to a 3/7/1966 NY Times report that in a Brahms violin concerto performance, Zino Francescatti’s projection of the first movement was so exciting that the audience erupted a resounding applause upon its completion.  The conductor, Erich Leinsdorf, uttered his congratulations to the soloist before continuing the performance.

And that is the beauty of a concerto.

young Seiji Ozawa with Leonard Bernstein
I put 3 symphonies here to get a taste of Seiji Ozawa's conducting, they are lengthy, but it will be worth your while.

Beethoven Symphony No 5 by Seiji Ozawa

NHK Symphony

10/26/2005

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d44qk2IQ7cI


Seiji Ozawa in action

Beethoven Symphony No 8 by Seiji Ozawa

Boston Symphony Orchestra. 貝多芬第八。

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r0pCTiclkm4


Brahms Symphony No 1 by Seiji Ozawa

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jyL6QmdLg90

Sunday, December 13, 2020

Three Russia-born female performers that happen to be immigrants with distinguished achievements

(朋友送來 Andrea Bocelli and Helene Fischer 合唱的 The Prayer, https://youtu.be/mI0x97D8N8g  response 時發現談到的三個女藝人都是來自蘇俄的移民所以決定放在部落格上.

Andrea Bocelli 也應該算是 Opera singer, 可惜因為視力的關係他很少在 opera 出現,但也演了不少 operas (每一opera, 演的次數不多): La Boheme, Madama Butterfly, Tosca, Carmen, Romeo and Juliet and Macbeth (這些 operas 我們最近都看過我們 1974 or 1975 曾在紐約 Lincoln Center  City Opera 看過 Carmen. Andrea Bocelli plays Don Jose in Carmen, 算是男主角。Elina Garanca (Russian born, studied in Vienna and US) 演我們最近看的 Carmen, 非常好,we are very impressed. 把我了解的 Carmen 的性格演得非常傳神。


 Andrea Bocelli 一起唱的是德國歌星 Helene Fischer, 唱得非常不錯她是當今德國最紅的歌星,不下於咱們的 Taylor Swift and Beyoncé, 2018 年的收入 $32 million. 2018 年在柏林的 Olympiastadion 演出非常轟動。這個 Olympia Satdium 就是 1936 Hitler showcased 德國的 宣傳地點。2018 年初她因生病(”infection”) 而取消七場表演這期間全國觀望等不及她趕快復原開始表演。德國報紙 Der Tagesspiegel 這期間有一篇文章說 “No ‘breathless’ for Berlin, when the concerts will be made up is still not clear” [Kein ‘Atemlos‘ für Berlin] ‘Atemlos’ is ‘Breathless’  Helene Fischer 的暢銷曲所以說 “No breathless for Berlin” 表示柏林還是要繼續等她。



Helene Fischer 
是蘇俄出生(西伯利亞的 Krasnoyarsk) 小時候去德國的移民,所以有很多人要求她利用她的背景及聲望在 social media speaks out against right wing radicalism and xenophobia and she did, at least on her Facebook page that I know of.  


三個多月來看了很多 Anna Netrebko 的歌劇好像「認識」她了:她是 Don Pasquale 裡的 Norina, Anna Bolena 裡的 Anne Boleyn (Henry VIII 的第二任妻子幾年前參觀 London Tower 時我在她上斷頭台的地方哀思一番)最近看 Macbeth, 她是 Lady Macbeth. Anna Netrebko 也是蘇俄出生去 Vienna, Austria 的移民幾個月前她回蘇俄表演得了 Civid-19 (從跟她一起唱歌的男歌星得到的中獎沒症狀, aerosol 更容易從口裡流出。本來 Metropolitan Opera 十月份有她的一個 special concert (ticket price $20) 臨時取消。



 email 提到的三個 female performers (pop star or opera singers) 都是蘇俄出生到其他國家的移民, is it coincidence?


Thursday, November 1, 2018

Reading science and medicine in nobel.com, I discover a captivating and beautiful musician


There was hardly a week went by without my looking into nobel.com site many times, rarely did I came back empty handed, I almost always discovered something, like today I found out the leukocyte (white blood cell) neutrophil eating the bacteria (invader) was the 1908 Nobel Prize in Medicine, that is to say the discovery was more than 110 years ago. We now know that was the initial step of the innate immunity.

Nobel laureate Frances Arnold of Caltech
I was trying to find out how Frances Arnold of Caltech uses evolutionary theory to design enzymes of medical uses or as she said “to copy nature's design process”, sort of tinkering the nature. She said “all this tremendous beauty and complexity of the biological world all comes about through this one simple, beautiful design algorithm, and what I do is use that algorithm to build new biological things.” It never escapes my notice that the first rated scientist always sees the the truth and beauty of the science involved, something beyond the reach of we mortals. George Smith of U. of Missouri and Sir Gregory Winter of Cambridge U. shared the award with her, they use the phage to display peptides and antibodies designed this way. I have been fascinated by how the phage (bacteriophae, the virus that invades the bacteria) contributed to the advance in science and medicine.

Violinist Lisa Batiashvili
But I have to wait for the answers until December 8 when they deliver their Nobel Lectures. But, I still didn't come back empty handed, as I discovered a captivating and beautiful musician, Lisa Batiashvili, the Georgia born violinist, who will be the soloist in the Nobel Prize Concert on December 8.

She grew up in Georgia until 11-years-old when the family left for Europe and eventually settled in Germany. Both parents are musicians. In one of the interviews she talked about how her family emigrated to Europe; they took the train to Moscow, where the policemen took all their money. An article in NY Times (1/31/2015) with a title of "Politics is Personal, and Professional" in which a story was told. She was once invited to perform with the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra led by Valery Gergiev who has close ties to Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin. Ms. Batiashvili, who has vowed not to perform in Russia. She accepted the invitation, but prepared a gesture of protest. She commissioned an encore for solo violin from a Georgian composer, Igor Loboda, titled “Requiem for Ukraine,” which she performed after her concerto.

Lisa Batiashvili plays an encore for the people in the Ukraine at Philharmonie Berlin

Lisa Batiashvili performing with husband, an oboist
In the interview she reminisces the nature and the mountains of her native country, Georgia. She is not just a musician with a pretty face,

Classic Talk: Interview with Lisa Batiashvili: Part 1

playing Georgia "Lalem"
She was the artist in residence with the New York Philharmonic in 2015. Being an ignoramus in music, I am reluctant to introduce a musician to you. But if you watch the Youtube of Sibelius Violin Concerto in D minor, you may agree with me why she was chosen as the soloist in this year Nobel Prize Concert, as we all know only the best, in science or in humanity or in music, is associated with the Nobel Prize. There is an encore (at 36:05) of Traditional Georgia “Lalem”.

SIBELIUS Violin Concerto

performing with Philadelphia Orchestra


Friday, April 28, 2017

Tchaikovsky’s 6th Symphony (Pathetique): A Requiem he commissioned for himself?

I have listened/viewed the Youtube of Tchaikovsky’s 6th Symphony (Pathetique) from time to time the past several years.  Janice sent several articles about this 6th Symphony trying to educate me.  But being an ignoramus in music in general and in classic music in particular, I found some of the writings too “technical” to me, such as talking about the second movement, “a ‘limping waltz’  theme boasting the near-miracle of a melody so smooth you’re hardly aware it’s in 5/4 time and missing a beat.”

Fortunately one doesn’t have to know “Pathetique” is passionate or pathetic to enjoy it.  I always have a strong conviction that understanding is the key to enjoyment; one can hardly enjoy thing one doesn’t understand, although some may argue that music is an exception.

To enhance the enjoyment of Tchaikovsky’s 6th Symphony, I tried to read everything about it that I can get my hands on.  The readings must have helped as my love of it deepened.

Complete, by Leonard Berstein

2:35 version

This is Bernstein’s analysis of Tchaikovsky’s 6th Symphony; it has 3 parts; somewhat lengthy, but it will be worth your while; I even bookmarked it.

I sometime wonder would they interpret it as a requiem had the seemingly healthy Tchaikovsky not died nine days after he led the premiere.  We read,

It ended with the Adagio lamentoso, which leaves the listeners in the most sorrowful mood.  In this Adagio the composer is as if bidding farewell to the living . . . one could hardly find anywhere such a shattering picture of human grief at the sight of irresistible death, to which one must submit however burdensome it is to part with life. . . This Adagio served as if for a ‘Requiem’ for Tchaikovsky himself.”

Boris Asafiev [a Russian musician] wrote,

He commissioned a Requiem for himself, for he composes the terribly intense sixth symphony, in which the tragic battle of the spirit with death unfolds . . . Oh, what a cruel, what a sharp sorrow Tchaikovsky likely suffered, composing it, foretelling in music what he was soon experiencing in reality, at the hour of his death!”

Tchaikovsky died Oct. 25, 1893.  Four days prior he drank a glass of unboiled water and dismissed his brother’s fright over it.  Cholera was going on in St. Petersburg then.



It is of interest to read an article on 5/24/1925 NY Times with a title of “A Russian composer's psychology”, in which Kashkin (his biographer) described a conversation he had with Tchaikovsky after he fled to Petrograd from his brief marriage with Antonina Miliukova in 1877.  Kashkin kept the conversation confidential until 20 years after his death.  Tchaikovsky was thinking about committing suicide and did try it once, in a way similar to what he did by drinking the unboiled water in an epidemic area of cholera; tragically he succeeded this time.

The newlyweds: Tchaikovsky and wife
Hidden sources of action in art based on a conversation between Tchaikovsky and his biographer, Kashkin, who kept the conversation confidential until 20 years after his death.

Tchaikovsky, after repeated attempt to accommodate himself to the marital estate, fled to Petrograd. There, in a condition of almost complete prostration, he was examined by the psychiatrist, Balinski, who gave his opinion that the composer must never see his wife again.

Years passed, Tchaikovsky had taken up his secluded and industrious life in Klin.  Kashkin saw much of him there, and Tchaikovsky, in a rare moment, opened his heart. . . "I sincerely desired and endeavored to be a good husband, but that proved beyond my power.  I cannot describe to you my condition when I realized that with this being utterly strange to me I was to pass the rest of my living days.  The sympathy for her that was springing up in me had turned into an aversion. I was completely aware that I alone was to blame for all this, that the only thing left was to suffer as long as my strength lasted and to conceal my misfortune from everybody.  I do not know just what called forth this necessity of secrecy. . .

In the state of minds it was quite natural to arrive at the conviction that I could be liberated only by death, which became for me a coveted dream; but I could not bring myself to an open suicide for fear of striking my aged father, as well as my brothers, too cruel a blow.  I began to think of a means of disappearing less noticeably and as if from a natural cause, and one of these means I even tried.

I went for a walk every evening and for several hours at a stretch aimlessly wandered through out of the way by streets of Moscow.  The weather was gloomy, chilly, and at night there were light frosts, on one of such nights I went to the deserted bank of Moscow River and the idea came into my head of a chance of catching deathly cold.  With this purpose in view, unobserved of anybody in the dark, I entered the water almost up to my waistline, and remained there as long as I could possibly stand for stinging pain in my body from the cold.  I came out of the water with the firm conviction that I could not escape death from inflammation of the lungs or from some other diseases resulting from a cold.  While at home I told them I had been in a fishing party, and inadvertently fell into the water.  However, my constitution proved so strong that the icy bath passed off without any evil consequence to me.  I did not contrive to make other experiments with the same purpose.

May be he didn’t try it again until several days after he conducted the premiere of the 6th Symphony when he recklessly (or ‘purposely’) drank that unboiled water during the height of cholera epidemic.  It makes one wonder.

Nowhere did I find the word of  “homosexuality” in the entire article (this was 1925), but one can tell that was what ‘tormented’ him.  The change of view of our society on this topic is no little thing; it proves the civilization is inexorably progressing.