(Linus Pauling is the greatest chemist the last century, not a physicist; but it is still fitting to place this article in the series of “In praise of physicist”).
Janice introduced me Alan Lightman’s The Discovery (see photo); it must be in early 2006, as I wrote about it in a “winter discontent” on 2/26/2006. I wrote “summer reading” or “winter discontent” as the series of “letters to my daughters”, which predated this blog, which was evolved from it.
Many years ago I wrote an article of “Molecular biology is quantum mechanics of biology, why?” and never liked it myself. I’ll use Linus Pauling (see photo) as an example to state my case. Lightman’s writing about Pauling’s work on chemical bond is enlightening. Pauling’s concept of hybrid (orbital hybridization) and resonance nature of chemical bondings is not the focus of this writing, but that is a genuine beauty and wonder through the application of quantum mechanics.
The above diagram shows hybrid orbital formation: one “s” and three “p” orbitals hybridized to form four new sp3 hybrid orbital. These hybrid orbitals are equivalent and directed to the corners of a tetrahedron, making angles of 109.47º with each other. In his 1927 paper, he wrote, “It has been further found that as a result of the resonance phenomenon a tetrahedral arrangement of the four bonds of the quadrivalent carbon atoms is the stable one. . . .A surprising result of the calculation, of great chemical significance . . . is that the second best [most pointed] bond orbital is equivalent to the first . . . and that its bond direction makes the tetrahedral angle of 109.47º with that of the first.” (Pauling's italic)
Pauling went to two of the three “birth places” of quantum mechanics right after he received his Ph.D. at Caltech in 1926-1927. He studied under Arnold Sommerfeld in Munich and Niels Bohr in Copenhagen and Erwin Schrödinger in Zürich. Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli were also around. If this doesn’t impress you, nothing will. He was literally there when the quantum mechanics was being born. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that he couldn’t come up with the hybrid concept of the carbon bonds without these exposures. In his Nobel Lecture in 1954, he said, “After the discovery of quantum mechanics in 1925 it became evident that the quantum mechanical equations constitute a reliable basis for the theory of molecular structure.”
Pauling had an advantage of being the only chemist among the giants in physics. Now I have explained how Pauling formulated his concept of chemical bonding using the quantum mechanics calculations. But one may ask: What’s this got to do with molecular biology?
Pauling was the first one to identify sickle cell anemia as a molecular disease in his paper published in Nature in 1949, using the technique of electrophoresis that was just became available. His contribution to molecular medicine is enormous. He almost beat Watson and Crick in figuring out the DNA structure. I recall reading Watson’s Double Helix, Watson wrote he read Pauling’s “The Nature of the Chemical Bond” (the Bible of chemical bond; I once checked it out from Carnegie Library; the price of $74.18 at Amazon.com deterred me from owning one. I do have his book of General Chemistry—see photo) as Watson felt he needed to know everything Pauling knew about chemical bonding; little did Watson know that was impossible.







